Case No. 1:19-cv-0060

Filed as a Plan to Resolve the 1933 National Banking Emergency, Emerge From Receivership Returning America to Solvency. Case number 1:19-cv-0060, a suit in equity, is a sovereign claim for the redemption of the property of the American people from and dissolution of the public trust.

There was no physical invasion of America in 1933 as FDR took the oath of office of the president of the United States. FDR’s New Deal conveyed the property of the American people into a public trust whose authority comes under the Trading With the Enemy Act rather than the U.S. Constitution.

FDR’s New Deal is considered to be a ‘paper’ occupation having taken control over the property of the American people without the need of an invasion. In accordance with the Laws of Belligerent Occupation the sovereign authority did not change hands but remains in the hands of the people.

A paper occupation, unlike an occupation via invasion, awaits the return of the sovereign to claim the return of his property. The people consented to the conveyance of their property to the public trust and can at any time revoke and terminate the bailment agreement for fraud and/or mis-use of the trust.

The termination of the bailment agreement, the Pledge, is final when the people decree it to be terminated. The people have so decreed. The Bailment Agreement is terminated. No adjudication required. IT IS DONE!

Court Documents

Suit in Equity 1:19-cv-0060

The suit is all about trusts and the enforcement of a trust indenture. The American people ‘voluntarily’ ‘Pledged’ their property to the Public Trust subjugating their republican form of government to a military administrated trust that became the Great American Socialist Experiment. The suit seeks to redeem the property from the public trust and the federal reserve banks via discharge of the debt.

The original intent of the trust was to resolve the National Banking Emergency NOT to further economically enslave the people.

85 years of history has established the evidence that the trust, as operated, can never resolve the National Banking Emergency as it continues to bury America in unsustainable debt.

Termination of the Public Trust would in fact accomplish the original intent of the Public Trust, i.e. Discharge the Debt, Public & Private and return America to solvency and prosperity.

One must understand that the funds to discharge the debt already exist! Not only that but the UNITED STATES INC. owes the American people interest for the use of their good faith & credit! These funds also ALREADY EXIST waiting the return of the sovereign people to claim them.

Redemption of America from the Public Trust would release America and her inhabitants from the grips of the Federal Reserve Banks and their private collection agency, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Click for Complete PDF  cv 060 Suit in Equity

Doc. #2 Issue and Service of Summons

The case was filed on January 11, 2019. The summons were received on January 16, 2019.

The court requires the Defendant to respond by March 17, 2019. (I know, a Sunday)

Doc. #3 Termination of Bailment Agreement Redemption of the Property

The matter at hand, a suit in equity, is a sovereign claim for the redemption of the property of the American people from and dissolution of the public trust.

There was no physical invasion of America in 1933 as FDR took the oath of office of the president of the United States. FDR’s New Deal conveyed the property of the American people into a public trust whose authority comes under the Trading With the Enemy Act rather than the U.S. Constitution.

FDR’s New Deal is considered to be a ‘paper’ occupation having taken control over the property of the American people without the need of an invasion. In accordance with the Laws of Belligerent Occupation the sovereign authority did not change hands but remains in the hands of the people.

A paper occupation, unlike an occupation via invasion, awaits the return of the sovereign to claim the return of his property. The people consented to the conveyance of their property to the public trust and can at any time revoke and terminate the bailment agreement for fraud and/or mis-use of the trust.

The termination of the bailment agreement, the Pledge, is final when the people decree it to be terminated. The people have so decreed. The Bailment Agreement is terminated. No adjudication required. IT IS DONE!

Secondly, the shut down of the government, the military civil administration of the Public Trust, was an abandonment of the territory by the provissional/occupational forces.

I demand the court use their inherent jurisdiction to take full control over the territory for the American people Claimants.

The Results? A sudden and unexpected re-opening of the government.

Click Here for Complete PDF      cv 060 Docket #3

Doc. #4 Brief in Support of Jurisdiction

Wishing to drive home the court’s fiduciary duty to the trust and the Beneficiaries (the American people) I filed the Brief in Support of Jurisdiction.

The matter at hand is NOT a claim by or charge against a subject of the public trust. The matter at hand is a claim by a returning sovereign for the redemption and return of his property that has been held in trust by the Custodian under TWEA.

The 1933 New Deal Pledge was/is a bailment agreement that conveys the property of the American people, at birth, to the public trust. Failure to voluntarily convey the property gives rise to the seizure of the property by the United States under TWEA. That bailment agreement/Pledge has been terminated. The trustee/Defendant no longer has any authority to hold the property.

The public trust gains its power and authority under TWEA and operates under the War Powers Act and are subject to the Geneva Convention Protocols and the Laws of Belligerent Occupation.

The district court adjudicates public policy and the affairs of the public trust. As such the district court is a neutral third party given the authority to perform certain duties with regard to the public trust.      Click Here for Complete PDF  cv 060 Docket # 4

Doc. #5 Emergency Demand for Protection of Trust

The civil administration has become a clear and present danger to the trust and the beneficiaries thereof. The civil administration actively foments civil conflict and division of the people in an attempt to fan the flames of inserrection and civil disobedience. Read Full PDF Here

Doc. #6 Motion to Dismiss

The U S is NOT a Party to the in personum action against the trustee, yet they filed a late Motion to Dismiss.

Motion to Dismiss

Doc. #7 Order to Respond to Motion

This was/is an order from the court to respond to the Motion to Dismiss

Doc. #8 Proposed Order
Doc. #9 Complaint Fraud on the Court

The case is a suit in equity against the Custodian of the Alien Property, as Trustee, and NOT a suit against the United States. The United States, a limited liability corporation is attempting to insert limited liability into the claim.

The trustee MUST come to the table in his full unlimited liability.  PDF Complaint – Fraud on the Court

Doc. #10 Memorandum

My status as the Keeper of the Seal of Saint Peter is NOT my claim, but is established in fact by third party testimony by the U S District Courts, the Vatican and the media.

Memorandum

Proposed Order

Doc. #11 Petition for Appointment of Trustee

Continuing my efforts to compel the court to take possession and control over the trust to dissolve the trust to facilitate the return of the property to the people I filed the following.

Petition for Appointment of Interum Trustee

Doc. #12 Rule 55 Motion for Default Judgment
Doc. 13 Entry of Evidence
Doc. 14 Memorandum

Opening the door for the entry of evidence for Co-Claimants

Memorandum PDF

The 1933 New Deal “Pledge” has been Terminated!

On the 4th of July President Trump spoke from the Seat of the Trustee, and delivered a Report to the BeneficiariesRead PDF Here

Plan to Emerge From Receivership Phase II

For the past 87 years the expansion and enforcement of the “Social Contract” and ‘civil rights’ have systematically encroached on the God given inalienable right of man. We have now re-established our status as Beneficiaries in Original jurisdiction wherein God granted man dominion over all things. But, what exactly are our inalienable rights? The constitution says that our inalienable rights are self-evident yet decades of debate have failed to settle the matter.

On the other hand, the constitution states that the sovereignty remains with the people and therefore suggest that the self-evident inalienable rights would be “All the rights of a sovereign.” Here we support that thinking and open the door for specific complaints to be addressed.

Read PDF – The Plan Phase II