Case No. 1:19-cv-0060

Case number 1:19-cv-0060, a suit in equity, is a sovereign claim for the redemption of the property of the American people from and dissolution of the public trust.

There was no physical invasion of America in 1933 as FDR took the oath of office of the president of the United States. FDR’s New Deal conveyed the property of the American people into a public trust whose authority comes under the Trading With the Enemy Act rather than the U.S. Constitution.

FDR’s New Deal is considered to be a ‘paper’ occupation having taken control over the property of the American people without the need of an invasion. In accordance with the Laws of Belligerent Occupation the sovereign authority did not change hands but remains in the hands of the people.

A paper occupation, unlike an occupation via invasion, awaits the return of the sovereign to claim the return of his property. The people consented to the conveyance of their property to the public trust and can at any time revoke and terminate the bailment agreement for fraud and/or mis-use of the trust.

The termination of the bailment agreement, the Pledge, is final when the people decree it to be terminated. The people have so decreed. The Bailment Agreement is terminated. No adjudication required. IT IS DONE!

Judge Rudolph Contreras

Court Documents

Suit in Equity 1:19-cv-0060

The suit is all about trusts and the enforcement of a trust indenture. The American people ‘voluntarily’ ‘Pledged’ their property to the Public Trust subjugating their republican form of government to a military administrated trust that became the Great American Socialist Experiment. The suit seeks to redeem the property from the public trust and the federal reserve banks via discharge of the debt.

The original intent of the trust was to resolve the National Banking Emergency NOT to further economically enslave the people.

85 years of history has established the evidence that the trust, as operated, can never resolve the National Banking Emergency as it continues to bury America in unsustainable debt.

Termination of the Public Trust would in fact accomplish the original intent of the Public Trust, i.e. Discharge the Debt, Public & Private and return America to solvency and prosperity.

One must understand that the funds to discharge the debt already exist! Not only that but the UNITED STATES INC. owes the American people interest for the use of their good faith & credit! These funds also ALREADY EXIST waiting the return of the sovereign people to claim them.

Redemption of America from the Public Trust would release America and her inhabitants from the grips of the Federal Reserve Banks and their private collection agency, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Click for Complete PDF  cv 060 Suit in Equity

Doc. #2 Issue and Service of Summons

The case was filed on January 11, 2019. The summons were received on January 16, 2019.

The court requires the Defendant to respond by March 17, 2019. (I know, a Sunday)

Doc. #3 Termination of Bailment Agreement Redemption of the Property

The matter at hand, a suit in equity, is a sovereign claim for the redemption of the property of the American people from and dissolution of the public trust.

There was no physical invasion of America in 1933 as FDR took the oath of office of the president of the United States. FDR’s New Deal conveyed the property of the American people into a public trust whose authority comes under the Trading With the Enemy Act rather than the U.S. Constitution.

FDR’s New Deal is considered to be a ‘paper’ occupation having taken control over the property of the American people without the need of an invasion. In accordance with the Laws of Belligerent Occupation the sovereign authority did not change hands but remains in the hands of the people.

A paper occupation, unlike an occupation via invasion, awaits the return of the sovereign to claim the return of his property. The people consented to the conveyance of their property to the public trust and can at any time revoke and terminate the bailment agreement for fraud and/or mis-use of the trust.

The termination of the bailment agreement, the Pledge, is final when the people decree it to be terminated. The people have so decreed. The Bailment Agreement is terminated. No adjudication required. IT IS DONE!

Secondly, the shut down of the government, the military civil administration of the Public Trust, was an abandonment of the territory by the provissional/occupational forces.

I demand the court use their inherent jurisdiction to take full control over the territory for the American people Claimants.

The Results? A sudden and unexpected re-opening of the government.

Click Here for Complete PDF      cv 060 Docket #3

Doc. #4 Brief in Support of Jurisdiction

Wishing to drive home the court’s fiduciary duty to the trust and the Beneficiaries (the American people) I filed the Brief in Support of Jurisdiction.

The matter at hand is NOT a claim by or charge against a subject of the public trust. The matter at hand is a claim by a returning sovereign for the redemption and return of his property that has been held in trust by the Custodian under TWEA.

The 1933 New Deal Pledge was/is a bailment agreement that conveys the property of the American people, at birth, to the public trust. Failure to voluntarily convey the property gives rise to the seizure of the property by the United States under TWEA. That bailment agreement/Pledge has been terminated. The trustee/Defendant no longer has any authority to hold the property.

The public trust gains its power and authority under TWEA and operates under the War Powers Act and are subject to the Geneva Convention Protocols and the Laws of Belligerent Occupation.

The district court adjudicates public policy and the affairs of the public trust. As such the district court is a neutral third party given the authority to perform certain duties with regard to the public trust.      Click Here for Complete PDF  cv 060 Docket # 4