America did not so much embrace drugs, rather Drugs Gripped the Nation in a vise like grip that refuses to let the people go!

And, It Was Intentional!

“If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched.”

— George H. W. Bush, cited in the June, 1992 Sarah McClendon Newsletter


“I have put thousands of Americans away for tens of thousands of years for conspiracy with less evidence than is available against Ollie North and CIA people.  I personally was involved in a deep-cover case that went to the top of the drug world in three countries. The CIA killed it.”

Former DEA Agent Michael Levine
CNBC-TV, October 8, 1996

I personally escorted the CIA to Medellin Columbia to seal a deal with Pablo Escobar to provide the guaranteed delivery of cocaine into Mena Arkansas. This followed the Vietnam war era practice of the CIA smuggling heroin in the bodies of our fallen soldiers. The details called for 1000 kilo ‘lots’, minimum one full lot per load, at a cost of $4300 per kilo guaranteed safe delivery to Mena Arkansas. Barry Seal and Oliver North were frequent flyers between Mena and Medellin delivering cocaine by the ton into American neighborhoods. America saw an almost immediate reduction in the price of cocaine from its highs near $50k per kilo to as low as $10k per. The streets were flooded with the purest cocaine ever to hit the streets of America and it was now affordable to a wider range of people.

Noriega provided a safe zone for refueling and repairs in route between Medellin and Mena, for a price, of course. ‘Manuel Antonio Noriega Moreno was a Panamanian politician and military officer who was the de facto ruler of Panama from 1983 to 1989. He had longstanding ties to United States intelligence agencies; however, he was removed from power by the U.S. invasion of Panama.’ Wikipedia

The products were purposefully designed and re-designed for maximum addictive effect. Once cocaine had a grip on the American people the CIA created a synthetic additive that made cocaine cheaper and a lot more addictive and was made available in ever cheaper ‘hits’ in the form of crack cocaine.

Big pharma has also gotten in on the profitable war against the people delivering their poisons out the back door by the 55 gallon drum into the streets of America. “Pill Mills’ were established where an addict could ‘legally’ receive over $14,000 worth of drugs (street price) for a mere few hundred dollar visit to the clinic. Today we see big pharma delivering ever more addictive and deadly drugs to the people as they rake in the profits off the misery of the people.

I have witnessed with my own eyes and ears the intentional depravity of the Deep State in their drug war against the people. And It Is Intentional! And It Is a War against the people with extremely evil intent! ‘They’ control over 85% of the flow of drugs worldwide and have absolutely zero intention of stopping or even slowing that flow! ‘They’ have intentionally designed drugs with both maximum acceptability and maximum addictablity with specific intent to control and enslave the people.

There are no unintended consequences. The plan was designed for maximum collateral damage while yielding maximum profits and control.

I have dedicated my life to exposing and ending the depraved corruption  and perpetual war against the people by our ‘public servants,’ at great personal cost. These pages are dedicated to my son, Michael James, whom I lost to this war on drugs and to the millions and millions of other unnamed casualties and fatalities of this ungodly war. May your suffering not be in vane!

Undisputed Global Drug Lords!
We are All Casualties of the War on Drugs

There is no one that remains untouched by the War on Drugs in some form or fashion. It has shredded the moral fabric of America; devastated millions of lives while their families suffered in their powerlessness. They intentionally turned brothers against brothers and friends against friends breeding an era of mistrust and division. The War on Drugs was designed to destroy America from within ….. and it has nearly succeeded!

Almost half of sentenced federal prisoners on September 30, 2017 were serving time for drug trafficking. Among sentenced prisoners under the jurisdiction of state correctional authorities on December 31, 2016, about 15% (190,100 prisoners) had been convicted of a drug offense as their most serious crime.”

Of the 3,789,800 adults on probation in the US at the end of 2015, 25% (approximately 947,450 people) had a drug charge as their most serious offense.

Complete Details Here

So, with whom does the responsibility/liability lie?

Culpability    In legal terms, fault means that someone was responsible for causing harm —  usually through carelessness that rises to the level of negligence  —  and  must pay.

Contributory Negligence   Contributory negligence essentially says that if you contribute to your own injury, you can’t hold anyone else responsible for it. In a pure contributory negligence system, if you are even one percent at fault and you suffer hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages, you can’t collect any compensation from the person who is 99 percent at fault.

Comparative Negligence Comparative fault is different from contributory negligence. Under a comparative negligence rule, the first assessment involves the amount of fault that belongs to each person (for  causing the accident or injury).

Pure Comparative Fault Vs. Modified Comparative Fault

Some states follow a “pure” comparative negligence rule, and other states have a general cut-off point in place  when it comes to just how  much fault an injured plaintiff can have and still collect from another at-fault party.  The states that set this dividing line in the sand are referred to as “modified comparative fault states” because they’ve changed the pure comparative fault rules. In states that follow a “modified comparative negligence” rule, an injured plaintiff can collect compensation from other at-fault parties as long as the plaintiff was less than 50 percent responsible for the accident or incident that led to the injuries.

The United States Intelligence Communities have intentionally waged war against the American people in the form of the War on Drugs;

The United States Intelligence communities historically have controlled 85% of the manufacture and distribution of drugs globally;

Therefore, the United States must bear 85% of the culpability, responsibility and liability for any/all violations of the U S drug laws.

     The Standard of Culpability                     The Nature of Man and His Government                                    Responsibility

We do not suggest that the people, although casualties of an ungodly war, are without culpability. They chose to participate and thus must bear some responsibility. But, if the U.S. had not been involved in this ungodly war against the people; If the U.S. had not flooded our neighborhoods with ever increasingly addictive poisons; If the U.S. had not …..

When government policy becomes morally repugnant…

The United States, operating under the sovereign authority of the people and funded by their Good Faith & Credit, engaged in an ungodly endeavor to destroy America from within. Operating with unconscionable reckless disregard for life you have waged perpetual war against the people; systematically criminalized and monetized every aspect of life creating a lawless society then you tax and punish the people for being lawless.

Failure to State A Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted

#1) Under any form of Comparative Negligence a Plaintiff who bears 85% of the culpability cannot hold anyone else responsible. The Plaintiff must come to the table with clean hands! The United States has/is operating with unclean hands and has no valid claim upon which relief can be granted in any drug case! The U.S. intentionally created the drug epidemic for the purpose of destroying America from within. To facilitate their ungodly plan the U.S. became a global manufacturer and distributor of drugs, both illicit and otherwise, and import their death and destruction to American neighborhoods, all in breach of the trust reposed in them by the American people.

#2) The real, living people, beneficiaries in original jurisdiction, hold the superior equitable claim by nature. The best the U.S. can hold is an equitable interest by characteristic or a commercial claims that are no more than derivatives and subordinate to the equity claim. If the U.S. creates and monetizes a derivative of my equity claim, then their claim becomes my claim. Anything you make from the use of my property is mine.

SAMPLE 12(b) Motions to Dismiss available at

Everyone Profits Except the Beneficiary

Every conviction gives rise to the issue of a series of bonds from which the Plaintiff U.S. benefits. The Judge also receives a percentage of the take added to his retirement fund and the prosecutor relishes in the conviction like a notch in his barrel. Everyone profits! Except the beneficiary, who becomes yet another casualty of the war on drugs.

Another life shattered. A family destroyed. A community broken. The fatalities and the casualties keep piling up. The profits continue to rise in proportion with the death and devastation in this ungodly war on drugs and NOTHING IS GETTING ANY BETTER! Of course not, that is their intent!

End the War Against the People and Let Us Begin to Heal

The American people are the clear losers in the War on Drugs. We are a conquered nation! Conquered from within by the very people to whom we have entrusted our safety and protection ….. our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness! Our ‘Public Servants’ have taken their power and authority to such an extreme as to supplant and enslave their creator!

WE have been programmed to believe that the casualties of war must be punished, subjected to ridicule, abandonment and loss of freedom, simply because they got caught up in the great scheme … the great war. Yet we all have been swept up into the war! We have all been effected by the war on drugs. We are all casualties of the war on drugs! A war intentionally designed to suck the people into participating in their own destruction. We ALL got sucked into the great War against the American people …. the War on Drugs! The American people are not the perpetrators here! We are the casualties!

To end this ungodly war against the people we must know who we are and from where our sovereign authority comes.

All Men and Women are Born Equal Sovereigns, Endowed with Unalienable Rights as Beneficiaries

“The word sovereign”, says J.S. Roucek and others, “entered the vocabulary of political theory from the feudal order, wherein it designated a relationship between persons. The term sovereign had been applicable to any feudal overlord with authority over subjects in his own dominion” which gave rise to the theory of the divine right of kings. As Beneficiaries in original jurisdiction the people owe fealty to their Creator, their one and only sovereign, while maintaining their divine right as kings to rule over their own kingdom.

When Jesus gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom the original trust was established. The Keeper of the Keys is a servant of the servants of God and as such is a trustee. The servants of God, the people, are the Grantees and Beneficiaries of the original trust and thus retain their sovereign authority and dominion over their personal kingdom. As trustee, the Keeper of the Keys to the Kingdom has a fiduciary duty to enforce God’s will and His Grant to man of dominion over all things.

The people’s sovereign authority and their divine right of self-rule are grants from God that pre-date and over stand the original trust, the world of legal fictions and the world of commerce. Speyer defined his sovereignty in 1193 thus: “I am born in a rank which recognizes no superior but God, to whom alone I am responsible for my actions”

God did not grant dominion over all things to ONE man nor a group of men, but rather to all men suggesting that every man is a king of his own kingdom, a sovereign, ruling by the divine right of kings.

Sovereignty Has Always Resided With the People

The constitution states that our inalienable rights are self-evident, yet inalienable rights have been the subject of debate for decades as special interest groups have sought to expand and/or limit inalienable rights.

Self-evident: Requiring no proof or explanation; Evident in itself without proof or reasoning; producing clear conviction upon a bare presentation to the mind; Evident without proof or reasoning; producing certainty or conviction upon a bare presentation to the mind; by ordinary human reason; clear or obvious without needing any proof or explanation: 2. so clear or obvious that no proof or explanation is needed.

Sovereignty rests with the people, therefore, the full rights of a sovereign would seem self-evident inalienable rights with a responsibility (social contract?) to harm nothing.

“Sovereignty is that power which is neither temporary nor delegated, nor subject to particular rules which it cannot alter, not answerable to any other power over earth”. -Pollock

“Sovereignty is the supreme will of the state”. -Willoughby The State being the condition of a person or thing, as with respect to circumstances or attributes: a state of health,” state of mind, physical state, natural state or a state of Being. The right of a sovereign to rule as set forth by the theory that holds that the sovereign receives the right to rule directly from God’s grant to man of dominion over all things as a divine right of kings and not from the people.

The divine right of kings, divine right, or God’s mandate is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch/sovereign is subject to no earthly authority, deriving the right to rule directly from the will of God. The king is thus not subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate or legal fiction creation within the realm. It implies that only God can judge an unjust king and that any attempt to depose, dethrone or restrict his powers runs contrary to the will of God and may constitute a sacrilegious act. It is often expressed in the phrase “by the Grace of God”, attached to the titles of a reigning sovereign.

The Declaration of Independence in 1776 described Americans as “one people” who had the right “to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them.” The founding fathers acknowledged the people as the sovereigns and their right to stand in their separate and equal stations, as sovereigns and kings over their own kingdom as granted by God.

The Vatican – The Beast of the Bible is:
“An entity who has taken its authority to such an extreme as to supplant its Lord.”​

According to Roman juristic theory the people were supposed, by the fiction of some illusionary social compact with their rulers, to have surrendered to their keeping and management, entirely and irrevocably, all of their rights, powers, privileges and immunities,

Locke, philosopher of the Revolution of 1688 and of the Declaration of Independence, thought the pre-civic state was equality and freedom, rather than war; and that then individuals were endowed with certain natural rights, but that for the better preservation and enjoyment of these rights every individual entered into a compact with the rest of the group by which he surrendered the exercise of a part of his natural rights for the protection and preservation of his remaining rights by a government to be instituted by the State. But, since the members of the group still retained many of their natural rights, neither the State nor the government instituted by it had an unlimited power over them, and if a government transcended its authority the people regained the whole of their natural liberty, a part of which they had surrendered conditionally, and they (instead of the State) could institute a new government.

Who, then, in the United States is sovereign? It is the people. The people, not as Rousseau suggested without determinate forms for the exercise of sovereignty; not as citizens of the United States nor as citizens of the various states: but the whole people as organized in government to express and adjust their will either directly or through representatives. At the present time, the people of the United States are politically organized under constitutions in a dual form of government. This is an accident. But the people are not an accident. They could change or abolish both their dual form of government and their constitutions. Even the clause in Article V, which provides that “No state without its consent shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate,” could probably be amended though some state should not consent. At any rate, while there is no right to revolution, after a revolution has been accomplished it is legal and a new constitution established thereby is legal. This power of revolution substantiates the doctrine that the people are sovereign, and shows that neither the states nor the Constitution is sovereign.” At the present time, the sovereign powers of the people are exercised by the various organs of government, through the joint action of the state and federal governments. Again, these organs of government are an accident. They are not sovereign. The people could change their Constitution and exercise their sovereignty in some other way, as through the initiative and referendum. The people have made the states and the nation artificial personalities to which the name State is given. They have created no artificial personality to correspond with the people as a whole viewed as a political unit. But this is of no importance. Sovereignty does not depend upon personality any more than personality depends upon sovereignty. Willoughby agrees that governmental organs are not sovereign. By the same argument the states and the nation are not sovereign. Both are like individuals before the law. Otherwise the Constitution would not recognize rights, privileges and immunities of individuals against the states and nation. Just as the colonies were not sovereign, though given almost complete autonomy, because the mother country still had the power of control, so neither the nation nor the states are sovereign because the people have the power of control.

Legislatures, executives and courts, consequently, are simply agents of the people to exercise certain sovereign powers for them, and they are ultimately responsible to the people. The states and the nation are but personalities created by the people, as they have created other artificial personalities, to perfect their political organization, but they are only manifestations of sovereignty and are not superior to their creator.

Constitutions are only further parts of the scheme of social control which the people have set up for the guidance and regulation of their agents, and to define and limit the manifestations of sovereignty. But the people of the United States Are the effective social forces. All power resides in them. It is they, who through their agents in states and nation delimit personal liberty by social control, and who through their constitutions protect it against social control; but they can make and unmake constitutions, states and agents. They are sovereign.

Cooley Says: “The theory of our political, system is that the ultimate sovereignty is in the people, from whom springs all legitimate authority. The people of the Union created a national Constitution and conferred upon it powers of sovereignty over certain subjects, and the people of each state created a State government to exercise the remaining powers of sovereignty so far as they were disposed to allow them to be exercised at all. * * *” Von Holst says “The government of a republic does not exist in its own right * * *. The source of all its power is the people* * *. Hence the Constitution represented the right of petition as a right independent of and existing before it * * *. The Constitution did not make the State a republic, but the republican people had given themselves this Constitution, and the right of petition is the only possible means corresponding to that end. * * *

The People indeed, are sovereign; but the people are not the aggregate of all individuals as such, to say nothing of a group of individuals constituted at pleasure, and of any desirable magnitude, but the population in its political organization.”

Briggs states: “In the United States the proper subject of sovereignty is the people, taken in the sense of the constitutionally qualified electorate, save in so far as they have delegated certain of these attributes to government, state or national.”

The Social Contract An Imaginary Construct of Man

Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority (of the ruler, or to the decision of a majority) in exchange for protection of their remaining rights or maintenance of the social order. The starting point for most social contract theories is an examination of the human condition absent of any political order (termed the “state of nature” by Thomas Hobbes). In this condition, individuals’ actions are bound only by their personal power and conscience. From this shared starting point, social contract theorists seek to demonstrate why a rational individual would voluntarily consent to give up their natural freedom to obtain the benefits of political order. It was posited that in the absence of political order and law, everyone would have unlimited natural freedoms, including the “right to all things” and thus the freedom to plunder, rape and murder; there would be an endless “war of all against all.”

The true sovereign, operating under their divine right of kings by the original grant of dominion over all things, also must accept the fiduciary duty to harm no one and their oath of fealty to be a good steward. The Sovereign authority granted by God is not a license to pillage and plunder, nor rape nor murder. Sovereignty, by the grace of God, respects all other sovereigns. He understands that we are all beneficiaries in original jurisdiction, each with an equal yet undivided portion of the whole. Each a divine sovereign by the grace of God, owing fealty to our Creator to be a good steward.

The self-evident social contract to “Harm no one” has been expanded, by the state, to such an extreme as to systematically encroach on the sovereign rights and authority of the beneficiaries. The State has used the illusionary, malleable and ever-expanding social contract to transform their delegated authority into the full-blown sovereign authority over the people. An entity cannot grant itself power or authority in excess of that granted them. To do so is a usurpation of power and authority and void. This social contract is a trespass on the people’s inalienable rights, enforcing civil rights for the protection of the legal fiction PUBLIC over inalienable rights, effectively stripping the people of their inalienable rights as sovereigns. The United States has covertly exceeded its delegated authority to such an extreme as to supplant its creator, the sovereign American people, in violation of divine law.

The sovereign’s divine right to self-governance is married to the self-evident social contract to harm no one and the fealty owed their Creator to be a good steward. The sovereign people have consented to no surrender of sovereignty in the delegation of responsibilities and their associated grant of authority. The sovereignty remains with the people, the beneficiaries in original jurisdiction.

The delegation of authority does not require a surrender of sovereign authority in the exchange. When Jesus gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom it did not diminish the Lord’s claim nor authority, but simply authorized Peter to act on the Lord’s behalf. So it is with the delegation of authority by the people does not diminish their claim or authority as sovereigns.

Equity sees the beneficiary as the true owner

“The people of the State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.” Added Stats. 1953, c. 1588, p.3270, sec. 1.

Weaponization of the Corporations Against the People

Today we see the weaponization of the corporations against the beneficiaries. Google, Facebook and Twitter, CNN, FOX, etc., to name a few, are private corporations who operate under a grant and license issued by the people’s delegated agents within the various states. The Grantee operating under the state issued grant and/or license to an entity, issued under their delegated authority, is an extension or franchise of that delegated authority, and comes with a fiduciary duty to the trust and an oath of fealty to the beneficiaries.

These corporations use of censorship against the beneficiaries to interfere with the election process, the forwarding of false narratives and/or to foment insurrection and civil conflict is contrary to their grant and license and constitute war against the beneficiaries.

The internet is the creation of the United States military established and developed with trust resources and are thus assets of the trust. Those who use the internet do so by the grace of the sovereign, are subservient to and owe an oath of fealty to the sovereign. The courts have declared that corporations are PERSONS enjoying the rights thereof, yet the corporation can never be sovereign for the sovereign is the source of the law while the corporation is a construct of the law and subservient to man and man’s law. Corporations, licensed by the state, are public servants owing fealty to the people as the sovereign authority and source of the law.

The Aggressor Who Enters Into A State of War

The aggressor who enters into a state of war with someone else and unjustly invades his victim’s rights can’t in this way come to have a right over whomever he has conquered. You will easily agree with this unless you think that robbers and pirates have a right to govern people they have mastered by force, or that men are bound by promises that were extorted from them by unlawful force. If a robber breaks into my house and with a dagger at my throat makes me sign documents conveying my estate to him, would this give him any title to my estate.

Obviously not! Well, that is just the kind of ‘title’ that an unjust conqueror wins through his sword when he forces me into submission. The harm is the same whether committed by the wearer of a crown or by some petty villain, and the crime is the same too. The offender’s status and the number of his followers make no difference to the offense, except perhaps to make it worse.

Nobody has power to subject a society to laws except with the society’s consent and by their authority; and therefore all the obedience that anyone can owe, even under the most solemn obligations, ultimately terminates in this supreme power— the legislature of the commonwealth —and is governed by the laws it enacts.

Beneficiaries In Original Jurisdiction

Let it be known by all men and their PERSONS that the American people, sovereigns by the Grace of God, their names written in the Book of the Tree of Life, Beneficiaries in original jurisdiction now coming as Grantor/Settlor of the trust now created with NOTICE of Unregistered Claim, of priority equitable right, title and interest in the res of the 1933 New Deal Public Trust, including all assets, attributes, derivatives and transmutations thereof, administrated under a provisional military occupational force under a Paper Occupation by the consent of the people. The sovereign people have returned to redeem their property and herein provide NOTICE of the Immediate Termination of the Bailment Agreement/Paper Occupation for the release and return of the property to the true owners, the beneficiaries in original jurisdiction.

The Claimants are beneficiaries in original jurisdiction, the One Consciousness having a human experience; The sons and daughters of the Almighty Ever Living Creator (the one source of all creation), seed of Abraham’s seed, joint heirs according to the promise whereby the Lord granted “dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; (Genesis 1:26).”

The Claimants are alien to yet tenants on the land called earth, overseers and stewards by express grant of the Lord, to whom alone We/They owe homage and allegiance. The Lord has proclaimed: “Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God; Ephesians (Ch. 2 v 19).” “We are not of the bondswoman, but of the free; Galatians (Ch 4 v 31).”

The Claimants reside in the physical body, transient domiciles, a ‘man,’ en esse, moto proprio; Living sentient beings, inspired by the Creator and acting on their own impulse having all of the rights of a sovereign, a king. As grantees and beneficiaries of the original grant, We/They over stand and have been granted dominion over all things, including all legal fictions of the world of commerce. Our Creator has never granted Us authority to animate or make use of an artificial limited liability “LEGAL PERSON”, to escape or limit our liability at any place or on any plane under a subjugated carnal theory of limited liability. We shall be fully responsible for Our private person’s engagement in this fictional world of commerce.

Claimants have denounced, withdrawn, revoked and made void any/all form of commercial status, assumed and/or presumed that has been forced upon Us/Them by deceit, fraud or otherwise. We/They have further denounced, withdrawn, revoked and made void all acts and/or actions which have been assumed and/or presumed to constitute Our voluntary consent to waive Our beneficial status in original jurisdiction for that of some inferior status and jurisdiction, for fraud failing full disclosure.

The Claimants do promise and pledge to be above reproach and to fully embrace the traits of honor and integrity. We/They shall at all times resist arrogance, violence, greed and excess choosing rather to be hospitable, a lover of good, self-controlled, upright, disciplined, equitable and at peace with the world. We/They accept full accountability for our words, deeds and actions. In all decisions I/We shall be always mindful of the 7th generation and the best and highest good of the divine estate. I/We acknowledge and accept that We are joint tenants on the land having a divine right of use of an undivided portion of the whole yet bear a responsibility to the whole.

The Claimant’s Creator is their signet and their authority as sovereigns and beneficiaries in original jurisdiction.

Equity sees the Beneficiary as the True Owner of the Property

The Property Claimed – The Trust Res

The Original Feudal Grant- Trust:  “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Genesis 1:264.  “Furthermore, God said, Let us make man according to our likeness and let them have rule over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the heaven, and over the beasts, and over all the earth, and over everything that creepeth upon the earth.”

David wrote, (Psalms 24:1-2) “The earth is the Lord’s, and all that therein is, the world, and they that dwell therein; {2} for he founded it upon the seas and established it upon the floods.” (Leviticus 25:23) The land must not be sold to be cut off from the family, because the land is mine and ye be but strangers and sojourners with me.

It is clear that the Lord created the heavens and the earth and that although He granted man dominion over His creation, he retained ownership. The Lord is the Grantor having granted the earth to man, the Beneficiary and Grantee. Yet He makes it clear that we are but strangers and sojourners suggesting a guest in the lands of our creator relationship in the nature of a trust.

The property consists of the beneficial right, title and interest in the divine estate which can be defined as an equal yet undivided portion of the whole as defined above. Each and every man has been granted dominion over all the earth. That is our divine inheritance, as Grantees and Beneficiaries, granted us by the Lord/the Divine Creator. As Beneficiaries the people/’Man’ hold all right, title and interest as the original owner.

The Original Trust

In Matthew 16:18 we see: ‘And I say also unto thee, thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hell will not overcome it. 19 I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom and whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Peter received the keys of the kingdom of heaven, earth, as a servant, steward and Trustee. He was not given dominion over man, nor was ownership over the divine estate conveyed to him. Peter became a servant and steward over the Lord’s creation. Peter became the primary Trustee, a servant of the servants of God.

When the Christ gave Peter the keys to the Kingdom he conferred the authority of the Divine Creator, as a trustee, on Peter. Peter had full authority, after the Divine Creator, to instill decisions that no one could revoke. “Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.” Peter had full authority to govern, permit and prohibit on legal and religious matters. This authority has been passed from Peter to each successor pope in turn. Each successor became a servant of the servants of our almighty Creator, ‘Man’, the beneficiaries in original jurisdiction.

Abstract of Title – Chain of Title

In the year 1213 pope Innocent marshaled a great deal of the estate under one legal title in the Holy Alliance 1213. Pope Innocent became a feudal lord over the estate which he held in trust granting administrative authority over the British Kingdom back to King John in the exchange.

The Grant of the Treaty of Paris of 1783

The Treaty of Paris of 1783 the king declared the American colonies free and independent, but stopped short of conveying ownership over the land as the king had no authority to convey land owned by the pope under the Holy Alliance1213 and thus was a mere grant of administrative authority over a feudal kingdom held in trust by the successor to Peter.

America is administrated today under the parent corporation named The United States executing the administration via a conglomerate of corporate STATES, DISTRICTS, CITIES and AGENCIES for and on behalf of the beneficiaries in original jurisdiction. The United States has deemed that the sovereignty shall remain with the people thereby protecting the rights of the beneficial owners of the land known as America.

The people’s right, title and interest in the divine estate has been Pledged to the United States via the 1933 New Deal as a solution to the national emergency of the day and is conveyed to the United States soon after their birth into the world. The conveyance is evidenced by the issue of the Certificate of Live Birth, a Certificate of Authority. The Congress of the United States has stated that the Pledge became a mortgage on the property and labor of the people establishing in fact that the conveyance did not convey ownership but only the usufruct. The people remain the beneficial owners having the right, title and interest in the property as the true owner.

Standing On Our Sovereign Authority By The Grace of God

We MUST know who we are and from where our sovereign authority comes. Our sovereign authority has not been taken from the people, the people have abandoned their sovereign authority under some misguided conception that one must surrender some of their sovereign authority when delegating authority. We DO NOT SURRENDER any sovereign authority via the delegation of authority.

We must stand on our sovereign unalienable rights by the divine right of kings. Our Creator is our authority! Our signet and our seal! We have published the following Legal Notice of an Unregistered Equity Claim in the Daily Washington Law Reporter and on and will make available Certification of Publication for use as evidence in any court action to support a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a claim upon which relief can be granted. Read full Legal Notice Publication.  Legal Notice

Cure the Breach of Trust

The time has come for the U.S. to take responsibility for their culpability in the ungodly War On Drugs that has resulted in the near destruction of the American way of life. The time has come to end the practice of laying off all responsibility on the people for the death and destruction of our families and communities. The time has come to end the practice of punishing the people for getting caught up in the ungodly wars of the U.S.

The time has come to remove the profit from the War on Drugs and demand a full accounting of all assets, attributes, derivatives and transmutations connected to the War On Drugs and and release and return them back to the people.

The time has come for the U.S. to discharge their duties and provide a cure for their 85% culpability.

Obligations of the Trust

The United States’s 85% culpability in the war on drugs is an implicit obligation of the trust without immunity, qualified or otherwise. The U.S. has deprived the beneficiaries the constitutionally mandated protection of our unalienable private property rights; Our unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. A deprivation of rights caused by actors acting under color of law thereby waiving any/all immunity that otherwise may have been available to them. The beneficiaries have a constitutionally protected unalienable right to freedom from government trespass on our private rights.

This deprivation of rights under color of law coupled with the U.S.’s implicit culpability of 85% establishes the beneficiary’s freedom from culpability and their right to avoid liability. This deprivation of rights under color of law coupled with the U.S.’s 85% culpability gives rise to the trustee’s fiduciary duty to accept responsibility for and to discharge their obligations owed the beneficiaries.

It is not so much a ‘right to avoid liability,’ for in equity there is no avoidance of liability, but it is more the placing the liability at the feet of the complicit in equal proportion to their culpability.

Beneficiary Instructions to Trustee

We the living people, beneficiaries in original jurisdiction, sovereigns by the Grace of God with an express grant of dominion over all things, including legal fiction creations of man, the cestue que vie, Our names written in the Book of the Tree of Life come now armed with the authority of the Divine Creator to accept and acknowledge the obligations of the trust placing same on special deposit for immediate settlement and closure of the obligation.

The beneficiaries have a right to equitable relief in the absolute discharge of the obligation with the release and return of the property to the rightful owners, the beneficiaries in original jurisdiction and hereby demand the trustee provide the equitable relief due the beneficiaries, to wit:

Immediately terminate the War On Drugs and all other wars against the beneficiaries;

Provide a full accounting of all assets, attributes, derivatives and transmutations associated with the War on Drugs;

Provide the beneficiaries an absolute discharge of the obligation as well as the Release and Return of all assets, attributes, derivatives and transmutations for immediate settlement and closure of the obligation.

Signed and sealed this the 14th day of August, 2019,

Our Divine Creator is our signet and seal


If you are one of the living people who demand that the U.S. terminate the war on drugs, accept their responsibility for their ungodly war and provide a cure for their 85% culpability then please sign the Petition at #ISecondThat. 


The Casualties & Fatalities of the War On Drugs

Their Stories

Be At Peace My Son. I love you!

He pitched a 98 mph fast ball at 16 years old, a scolarship on its way. Then the Universe threw him a curve ball in the form of a car accident and a doctor all too willing to provide him all of the pain medication he requested, ….. until he didn’t! The doctor allowed an addiction to pain pills go unaddressed. Just cut him off and let him go!  Not his problem! The next decade saw two more accidents and too many to count jail cells and rehab sessions to no avail. The drugs had their grip on him and refused to let go.

I can tell you that once those drugs took hold of him he was powerless …. We were powerless, so we turned to God …. And God called him home …. leaving us to try to make sense of it all for his sons. But, how do you make sense of such a senseless tragedy to a child when you cannot make sense of it yourself?


I know Wayne personally. I lived with him for a few years in the Cross Bar Hotel where you really get to know what a person is all about. I can say that I never saw a violent nor angry moment out of Wayne in those few years and I wondered how he could have gotten into such a jam. He was not a career criminal but a normal guy, much like my son, who got caught up in the War On Drugs and in a drug induced moment he found himself in a life changing situation with absolutely no way out.

Wayne readily accepts responsibility for his actions and does not minimize the effect his actions had on a family, but, does a man not deserve a second chance? Is there no help nor forgiveness for the casualties of this ungodly war on drugs? I ask you to sign the petition for clemency and give Wayne a second chance at life. He deserves it!!

Clemency Petition